East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Slovak Republic: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark … Denmark gaps

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
20.70 million current US$
in 2023
Slovak Republic
3.83 million current US$
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
33rd
Slovak Republic rank
30th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark … Denmark gaps over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Slovak Republic
050.0M100.0M150.0M196019912023

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) currently reports 20.70 million current US$ against 3.83 million current US$ in Slovak Republic, a difference of 16.87 million current US$.

That makes East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s figure about 5.4 times Slovak Republic's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 33rd and Slovak Republic ranks 30th of 46 groups.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Slovak Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 56.38 million current US$ 836,000 current US$ 55.55 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 102.71 million current US$ 4.04 million current US$ 98.67 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Slovak Republic?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), at 20.70 million current US$ against 3.83 million current US$ in Slovak Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Slovak Republic?
16.87 million current US$, with East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Slovak Republic?
15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Slovak Republic rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 33rd and Slovak Republic ranks 30th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Slovak Republic: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/slovak-republic/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Slovak Republic: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 7,224 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.