East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) currently reports 20.70 million current US$ against 3.66 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 17.04 million current US$.
That makes East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s figure about 5.7 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 32.19 million current US$ | 350,000 current US$ | 31.84 million current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 22.23 million current US$ | 8.27 million current US$ | 13.97 million current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 56.38 million current US$ | 21.72 million current US$ | 34.66 million current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 116.23 million current US$ | 12.15 million current US$ | 104.08 million current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 63.58 million current US$ | 17.44 million current US$ | 46.14 million current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 27.12 million current US$ | 5.02 million current US$ | 22.10 million current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Zimbabwe?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), at 20.70 million current US$ against 3.66 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
- 17.04 million current US$, with East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
- 47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.