East Asia & Pacific vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps

East Asia & Pacific
20.70 million current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
3.66 million current US$
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Zimbabwe
050.0M100.0M150.0M196019912023

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific currently reports 20.70 million current US$ against 3.66 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 17.04 million current US$.

That makes East Asia & Pacific's figure about 5.7 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was East Asia & Pacific ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.

East Asia & Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 32.19 million current US$ 350,000 current US$ 31.84 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
1980s 22.23 million current US$ 8.27 million current US$ 13.97 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
1990s 56.38 million current US$ 21.72 million current US$ 34.66 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2000s 116.23 million current US$ 12.15 million current US$ 104.08 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2010s 63.58 million current US$ 17.44 million current US$ 46.14 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2020s 27.12 million current US$ 5.02 million current US$ 22.10 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, East Asia & Pacific or Zimbabwe?
East Asia & Pacific, at 20.70 million current US$ against 3.66 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe?
17.04 million current US$, with East Asia & Pacific ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific/zimbabwe/">East Asia & Pacific vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 7,224 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.