Europe & Central Asia vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps

Europe & Central Asia
209.38 million current US$
in 2023
Rwanda
14.03 million current US$
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
20th
Rwanda rank
18th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Rwanda
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196019912023

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia currently reports 209.38 million current US$ against 14.03 million current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 195.35 million current US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia's figure about 14.9 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Europe & Central Asia ahead.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 46 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 35,000 current US$ 15,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ Europe & Central Asia
1970s 362,000 current US$ 118,000 current US$ 244,000 current US$ Europe & Central Asia
1980s -94,000 current US$ 212,000 current US$ 306,000 current US$ Rwanda
1990s 4.04 million current US$ 1.27 million current US$ 2.77 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2000s 31.29 million current US$ 1.72 million current US$ 29.58 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2010s 20.74 million current US$ 1.27 million current US$ 19.47 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2020s 108.55 million current US$ 6.43 million current US$ 102.12 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Europe & Central Asia or Rwanda?
Europe & Central Asia, at 209.38 million current US$ against 14.03 million current US$ in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Europe & Central Asia and Rwanda?
195.35 million current US$, with Europe & Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Rwanda?
50 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia/rwanda/">Europe & Central Asia vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 7,224 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.