Lithuania vs Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time
- Lithuania
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 1.96 million current US$ against 1.44 million current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 520,000 current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.4 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 50th and Romania ranks 47th of 135 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.10 million current US$ | 2.49 million current US$ | 5.61 million current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 11.91 million current US$ | 5.12 million current US$ | 6.80 million current US$ | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Lithuania or Romania?
- Romania, at 1.96 million current US$ against 1.44 million current US$ in Lithuania as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Lithuania and Romania?
- 520,000 current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Romania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Lithuania and Romania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Lithuania ranks 50th and Romania ranks 47th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.