Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
- Rwanda
How they compare
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) currently reports 238.97 million current US$ against 14.03 million current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 224.95 million current US$.
That makes Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)'s figure about 17.0 times Rwanda's.
Across all 50 years both countries report, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 46 groups.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.88 million current US$ | 15,000 current US$ | 2.87 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1970s | 10.64 million current US$ | 118,000 current US$ | 10.52 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 16.62 million current US$ | 212,000 current US$ | 16.41 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 39.51 million current US$ | 1.27 million current US$ | 38.23 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 88.48 million current US$ | 1.72 million current US$ | 86.76 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 207.88 million current US$ | 1.27 million current US$ | 206.61 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 261.08 million current US$ | 6.43 million current US$ | 254.65 million current US$ | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) or Rwanda?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), at 238.97 million current US$ against 14.03 million current US$ in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Rwanda?
- 224.95 million current US$, with Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Rwanda?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
- How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.