Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Kosovo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.8418 current US$ per person
in 2023
Kosovo
11.33 current US$ per person
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
1st
Kosovo rank
1st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Kosovo
02.557.51012.5196019912023

How they compare

Kosovo currently reports 11.33 current US$ per person against 0.8418 current US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 10.49 current US$ per person.

That makes Kosovo's figure about 13.5 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 1st of 46 groups.

Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Kosovo Difference Ahead
2000s 0.1199 current US$ per person 3.47 current US$ per person 3.35 current US$ per person Kosovo
2010s 0.1436 current US$ per person 1.99 current US$ per person 1.84 current US$ per person Kosovo
2020s 0.7544 current US$ per person 5.73 current US$ per person 4.98 current US$ per person Kosovo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Kosovo?
Kosovo, at 11.33 current US$ per person against 0.8418 current US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Kosovo?
10.49 current US$ per person, with Kosovo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Kosovo?
12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Kosovo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 1st of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Kosovo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/kosovo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/kosovo/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Kosovo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 6,846 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.