Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Low & middle income
0.2994 current US$ per person
in 2023
Rwanda
1.01 current US$ per person
in 2023
Low & middle income rank
15th
Rwanda rank
15th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Rwanda
00.250.50.751196019912023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 1.01 current US$ per person against 0.2994 current US$ per person in Low & middle income, a difference of 0.7106 current US$ per person.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 3.4 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Low & middle income ahead.

Low & middle income ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 46 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low & middle income averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0089 current US$ per person 0.004 current US$ per person 0.005 current US$ per person Low & middle income
1970s 0.0306 current US$ per person 0.0211 current US$ per person 0.0095 current US$ per person Low & middle income
1980s 0.0889 current US$ per person 0.0333 current US$ per person 0.0556 current US$ per person Low & middle income
1990s 0.1917 current US$ per person 0.1694 current US$ per person 0.0223 current US$ per person Low & middle income
2000s 0.2547 current US$ per person 0.1905 current US$ per person 0.0642 current US$ per person Low & middle income
2010s 0.3566 current US$ per person 0.1213 current US$ per person 0.2353 current US$ per person Low & middle income
2020s 0.2859 current US$ per person 0.4724 current US$ per person 0.1865 current US$ per person Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Low & middle income or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 1.01 current US$ per person against 0.2994 current US$ per person in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Low & middle income and Rwanda?
0.7106 current US$ per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Rwanda?
44 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Low & middle income and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Low & middle income ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-capita/low-and-middle-income/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-capita/low-and-middle-income/rwanda/">Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 6,846 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.