Pre-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Pre-demographic dividend
0.3276 current US$ per person
in 2022
Rwanda
1.01 current US$ per person
in 2023
Pre-demographic dividend rank
12th
Rwanda rank
15th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Pre-demographic dividend
  • Rwanda
00.250.50.7511.2196819952023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 1.01 current US$ per person against 0.3276 current US$ per person in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.6824 current US$ per person.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 3.1 times Pre-demographic dividend's.

Across all 41 years both countries report, Pre-demographic dividend has been ahead every year.

Pre-demographic dividend ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 46 groups.

Pre-demographic dividend has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pre-demographic dividend Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1328 current US$ per person 0.0211 current US$ per person 0.1116 current US$ per person Pre-demographic dividend
1980s 0.3965 current US$ per person 0.0333 current US$ per person 0.3632 current US$ per person Pre-demographic dividend
1990s 0.5795 current US$ per person 0.1694 current US$ per person 0.4102 current US$ per person Pre-demographic dividend
2000s 0.7848 current US$ per person 0.1905 current US$ per person 0.5944 current US$ per person Pre-demographic dividend
2010s 0.8548 current US$ per person 0.1213 current US$ per person 0.7335 current US$ per person Pre-demographic dividend
2020s 0.4357 current US$ per person 0.2948 current US$ per person 0.1409 current US$ per person Pre-demographic dividend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Pre-demographic dividend or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 1.01 current US$ per person against 0.3276 current US$ per person in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Pre-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
0.6824 current US$ per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pre-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
41 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Pre-demographic dividend and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Pre-demographic dividend ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pre-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-capita/pre-demographic-dividend/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-capita/pre-demographic-dividend/rwanda/">Pre-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 6,846 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.