Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Tanzania, United Republic of
0.2169 current US$ per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.2239 current US$ per person
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
37th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
0123196519942023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2239 current US$ per person against 0.2169 current US$ per person in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.007 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 135 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 2.02 current US$ per person 0.0124 current US$ per person 2.01 current US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 2.09 current US$ per person 0.9296 current US$ per person 1.16 current US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 2.68 current US$ per person 1.97 current US$ per person 0.7066 current US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 2.26 current US$ per person 0.9713 current US$ per person 1.28 current US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 1.66 current US$ per person 1.36 current US$ per person 0.2939 current US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.5722 current US$ per person 0.3166 current US$ per person 0.2556 current US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.2239 current US$ per person against 0.2169 current US$ per person in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
0.007 current US$ per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-capita/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-capita/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 6,846 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.