Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0117 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.0209 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
118th
Congo rank
117th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Congo
-50050100150196719952023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0209 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0117 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0092 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.8 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Congo ranks 117th of 134 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 77.15 current US$ per square kilometre -0.7321 current US$ per square kilometre 77.88 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 69.73 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0439 current US$ per square kilometre 69.68 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 8.24 current US$ per square kilometre 3.52 current US$ per square kilometre 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s -7.54 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1868 current US$ per square kilometre 7.73 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Congo?
Congo, at 0.0209 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0117 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
0.0092 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
12 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Congo ranks 117th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/congo-rep/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.