Central Europe and the Baltics vs Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.4619 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Türkiye
17.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
39th
Türkiye rank
37th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Türkiye
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 17.99 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.4619 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 17.53 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Türkiye's figure about 38.9 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 39th and Türkiye ranks 37th of 46 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 2 and Türkiye in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Türkiye Difference Ahead
1990s 41.03 current US$ per square kilometre -0.3736 current US$ per square kilometre 41.41 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 27.96 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6159 current US$ per square kilometre 27.35 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2010s 0.4619 current US$ per square kilometre 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8374 current US$ per square kilometre Türkiye

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Central Europe and the Baltics or Türkiye?
Türkiye, at 17.99 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.4619 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Central Europe and the Baltics and Türkiye?
17.53 current US$ per square kilometre, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Türkiye?
19 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Türkiye rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 39th and Türkiye ranks 37th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/turkiye/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.