East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1.52 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Lithuania
22.97 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
33rd
Lithuania rank
31st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Lithuania
0100200300400197019962022

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 22.97 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 21.45 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 15.1 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd and Lithuania ranks 31st of 46 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 4.39 current US$ per square kilometre 156.6 current US$ per square kilometre 152.21 current US$ per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 6.36 current US$ per square kilometre 190.08 current US$ per square kilometre 183.71 current US$ per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 22.97 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Lithuania?
21.45 current US$ per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Lithuania?
12 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Lithuania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd and Lithuania ranks 31st of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/lithuania/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.