East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1.52 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
South Sudan
19.01 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
33rd
South Sudan rank
35th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • South Sudan
0204060197019962023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 19.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 17.49 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 12.5 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 11 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd and South Sudan ranks 35th of 46 groups.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre 36.7 current US$ per square kilometre 33.64 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan
2020s 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre 24.85 current US$ per square kilometre 23.04 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 19.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and South Sudan?
17.49 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and South Sudan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd and South Sudan ranks 35th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/south-sudan/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.