Eswatini vs IDA & IBRD total: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Eswatini
29.65 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
IDA & IBRD total
8.32 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Eswatini rank
24th
IDA & IBRD total rank
24th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • IDA & IBRD total
-1000100200300400196819952022

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 29.65 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.32 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 21.33 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 3.6 times IDA & IBRD total's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 24th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 24th of 134 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and IDA & IBRD total in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini IDA & IBRD total Difference Ahead
1970s 44.13 current US$ per square kilometre 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre 42.75 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 109.95 current US$ per square kilometre 4.05 current US$ per square kilometre 105.9 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 30 current US$ per square kilometre 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre 22.94 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s -46.28 current US$ per square kilometre 10.5 current US$ per square kilometre 56.78 current US$ per square kilometre IDA & IBRD total
2010s -4.65 current US$ per square kilometre 14.14 current US$ per square kilometre 18.79 current US$ per square kilometre IDA & IBRD total

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Eswatini or IDA & IBRD total?
Eswatini, at 29.65 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.32 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2011.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Eswatini and IDA & IBRD total?
21.33 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and IDA & IBRD total?
41 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2011.
How do Eswatini and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 24th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 24th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs IDA & IBRD total: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/ida-and-ibrd-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/ida-and-ibrd-total/">Eswatini vs IDA & IBRD total: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.