Eswatini vs South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Eswatini
29.65 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
South Asia
8.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
24th
South Asia rank
22nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • South Asia
-1000100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 29.65 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.68 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia, a difference of 20.97 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 3.4 times South Asia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1968 it was South Asia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 24th and South Asia ranks 22nd of 134 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and South Asia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini South Asia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5814 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7807 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1993 current US$ per square kilometre South Asia
1970s 44.13 current US$ per square kilometre 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre 38.64 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 109.95 current US$ per square kilometre 21.31 current US$ per square kilometre 88.63 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 30 current US$ per square kilometre 31.02 current US$ per square kilometre 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre South Asia
2000s -46.28 current US$ per square kilometre 31.63 current US$ per square kilometre 77.91 current US$ per square kilometre South Asia
2010s -4.65 current US$ per square kilometre 41.11 current US$ per square kilometre 45.76 current US$ per square kilometre South Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Eswatini or South Asia?
Eswatini, at 29.65 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.68 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia as of 2011.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Eswatini and South Asia?
20.97 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and South Asia?
42 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2011.
How do Eswatini and South Asia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 24th and South Asia ranks 22nd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/south-asia/">Eswatini vs South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.