IDA blend vs Somalia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

IDA blend
15.65 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Somalia
82 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA blend rank
17th
Somalia rank
14th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • IDA blend
  • Somalia
020406080100196919962023

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 82 current US$ per square kilometre against 15.65 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend, a difference of 66.35 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Somalia's figure about 5.2 times IDA blend's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1971 it was IDA blend ahead.

IDA blend ranks 17th and Somalia ranks 14th of 46 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, IDA blend averaged higher in 4 and Somalia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend Somalia Difference Ahead
1970s 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre 0.066 current US$ per square kilometre 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre IDA blend
1980s 8.22 current US$ per square kilometre 5.69 current US$ per square kilometre 2.52 current US$ per square kilometre IDA blend
1990s 9.4 current US$ per square kilometre 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre IDA blend
2000s 16.48 current US$ per square kilometre 10.66 current US$ per square kilometre 5.81 current US$ per square kilometre IDA blend
2010s 16.44 current US$ per square kilometre 51.5 current US$ per square kilometre 35.06 current US$ per square kilometre Somalia
2020s 14.9 current US$ per square kilometre 71.16 current US$ per square kilometre 56.26 current US$ per square kilometre Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, IDA blend or Somalia?
Somalia, at 82 current US$ per square kilometre against 15.65 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between IDA blend and Somalia?
66.35 current US$ per square kilometre, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Somalia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2022.
How do IDA blend and Somalia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
IDA blend ranks 17th and Somalia ranks 14th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Somalia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-blend/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-blend/somalia-fed-rep/">IDA blend vs Somalia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.