Low income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Low income
24.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
568.55 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
4th
Rwanda rank
3rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Low income
  • Rwanda
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 568.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 24.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 544.5 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 23.6 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Rwanda ahead.

Low income ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 46 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3254 current US$ per square kilometre 0.608 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2827 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0.9214 current US$ per square kilometre 4.05 current US$ per square kilometre 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 5.18 current US$ per square kilometre 9.37 current US$ per square kilometre 4.2 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 12.64 current US$ per square kilometre 51.52 current US$ per square kilometre 38.88 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 22.4 current US$ per square kilometre 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre 47.37 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 32.9 current US$ per square kilometre 51.36 current US$ per square kilometre 18.46 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 26.9 current US$ per square kilometre 260.74 current US$ per square kilometre 233.83 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Low income or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 568.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 24.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Low income and Rwanda?
544.5 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Rwanda?
44 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Low income and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Low income ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/rwanda/">Low income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.