Nigeria vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Nigeria
3.34 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
2.74 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria rank
69th
Zambia rank
71st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Nigeria
  • Zambia
050100196619942023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.6 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Zambia ahead.

Nigeria ranks 69th and Zambia ranks 71st of 134 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7466 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7567 current US$ per square kilometre 0.01 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.4414 current US$ per square kilometre 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0714 current US$ per square kilometre 6.66 current US$ per square kilometre 6.59 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre 27.53 current US$ per square kilometre 26.18 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 35.66 current US$ per square kilometre 50.01 current US$ per square kilometre 14.35 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre 25.42 current US$ per square kilometre 24.35 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre 2.9 current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Nigeria or Zambia?
Nigeria, at 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Nigeria and Zambia?
0.6 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Zambia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Nigeria and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Nigeria ranks 69th and Zambia ranks 71st of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/zambia/">Nigeria vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.