Eswatini vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Eswatini
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Post-demographic dividend
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Eswatini rank
34th
Post-demographic dividend rank
31st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Post-demographic dividend
-0.00300.0030.0050.0070.01196819952022

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 41.3 times Post-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 34th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 31st of 134 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Post-demographic dividend in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0031 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0031 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1980s 0.0032 current US$ per US$ of GDP -0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0032 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1990s 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
2000s -0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Post-demographic dividend
2010s -0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Post-demographic dividend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Eswatini or Post-demographic dividend?
Eswatini, at 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Post-demographic dividend as of 2011.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Eswatini and Post-demographic dividend?
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Post-demographic dividend?
41 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2011.
How do Eswatini and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 34th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 31st of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/post-demographic-dividend/">Eswatini vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,634 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.