Guinea-Bissau vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Guinea-Bissau
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2014
Post-demographic dividend
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Guinea-Bissau rank
32nd
Post-demographic dividend rank
31st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Post-demographic dividend
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01197019962022

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 45.0 times Post-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 32nd and Post-demographic dividend ranks 31st of 134 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0048 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0048 current US$ per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.0021 current US$ per US$ of GDP -0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0021 current US$ per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.0022 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0022 current US$ per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Guinea-Bissau or Post-demographic dividend?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Post-demographic dividend as of 2014.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Guinea-Bissau and Post-demographic dividend?
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Post-demographic dividend?
38 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2014.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 32nd and Post-demographic dividend ranks 31st of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/guinea-bissau/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/guinea-bissau/post-demographic-dividend/">Guinea-Bissau vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,634 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.