IDA blend vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per
IDA blend
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
South Sudan
0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2015
IDA blend rank
16th
South Sudan rank
14th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time
- IDA blend
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA blend, a difference of 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 15.4 times IDA blend's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
IDA blend ranks 16th and South Sudan ranks 14th of 46 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, IDA blend or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA blend as of 2015.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between IDA blend and South Sudan?
- 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do IDA blend and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- IDA blend ranks 16th and South Sudan ranks 14th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.