Jordan vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Jordan
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Post-demographic dividend
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Jordan rank
33rd
Post-demographic dividend rank
31st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Jordan
  • Post-demographic dividend
-0.00100.0010.0010.002196719952023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Jordan's figure about 41.9 times Post-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 33rd and Post-demographic dividend ranks 31st of 134 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP Jordan
1980s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP -0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Jordan
1990s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Jordan
2000s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Jordan
2010s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Jordan
2020s 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Jordan or Post-demographic dividend?
Jordan, at 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Post-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Jordan and Post-demographic dividend?
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Post-demographic dividend?
45 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Jordan and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Jordan ranks 33rd and Post-demographic dividend ranks 31st of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/jordan/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/jordan/post-demographic-dividend/">Jordan vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,634 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.