Guinea vs Peru: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark over time
- Guinea
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports -909 current US$ against -1,008 current US$ in Guinea, a difference of 99 current US$.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 125th and Peru ranks 124th of 134 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 330,000 current US$ | 150,000 current US$ | 180,000 current US$ | Guinea |
| 1980s | 1.60 million current US$ | 184,444 current US$ | 1.41 million current US$ | Guinea |
| 1990s | 2.89 million current US$ | 1.94 million current US$ | 945,556 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2000s | 25,000 current US$ | -70,000 current US$ | 95,000 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2010s | 55,000 current US$ | 1.01 million current US$ | 955,000 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 365,740 current US$ | 65,734 current US$ | 300,006 current US$ | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark, Guinea or Peru?
- Peru, at -909 current US$ against -1,008 current US$ in Guinea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark between Guinea and Peru?
- 99 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2022.
- How do Guinea and Peru rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark?
- Guinea ranks 125th and Peru ranks 124th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.