Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Belarus
87.91 % change on previous year
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
-11.88 % change on previous year
in 2022
Belarus rank
24th
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
22nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Belarus
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
-1000100200300197119972023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 87.91 % change on previous year against -11.88 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 99.79 % change on previous year.

That makes Belarus's figure about 7.4 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 24th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 22nd of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
2000s 50.73 % change on previous year 9.34 % change on previous year 41.39 % change on previous year Belarus
2010s 39.55 % change on previous year -0.4793 % change on previous year 40.03 % change on previous year Belarus
2020s -24.53 % change on previous year 3.24 % change on previous year 27.77 % change on previous year Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Belarus or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Belarus, at 87.91 % change on previous year against -11.88 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
99.79 % change on previous year, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
How do Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Belarus ranks 24th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 22nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-annual/belarus/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-annual/belarus/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,818 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.