Central Europe and the Baltics vs Kiribati: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Central Europe and the Baltics
-18.89 % change on previous year
in 2010
Kiribati
73.24 % change on previous year
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
33rd
Kiribati rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Kiribati
0200400600198220022023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 73.24 % change on previous year against -18.89 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 92.13 % change on previous year.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 3.9 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Kiribati ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 33rd and Kiribati ranks 32nd of 44 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s 40.22 % change on previous year 28 % change on previous year 12.21 % change on previous year Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 15.7 % change on previous year 37.55 % change on previous year 21.86 % change on previous year Kiribati
2010s -18.89 % change on previous year -59.28 % change on previous year 40.39 % change on previous year Central Europe and the Baltics

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Central Europe and the Baltics or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 73.24 % change on previous year against -18.89 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Central Europe and the Baltics and Kiribati?
92.13 % change on previous year, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Kiribati?
20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Kiribati rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 33rd and Kiribati ranks 32nd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Kiribati: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-annual/central-europe-and-the-baltics/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-annual/central-europe-and-the-baltics/kiribati/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Kiribati: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,818 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.