East Asia & Pacific vs South Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

East Asia & Pacific
6.32 % change on previous year
in 2023
South Africa
181.13 % change on previous year
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
14th
South Africa rank
13th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • South Africa
-50005001.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 181.13 % change on previous year against 6.32 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 174.81 % change on previous year.

That makes South Africa's figure about 28.7 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was East Asia & Pacific ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 13th of 44 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 11.98 % change on previous year 17.34 % change on previous year 5.36 % change on previous year South Africa
2000s 8.82 % change on previous year 2.22 % change on previous year 6.6 % change on previous year East Asia & Pacific
2010s 3.58 % change on previous year 70.11 % change on previous year 66.54 % change on previous year South Africa
2020s 4.17 % change on previous year -32.78 % change on previous year 36.95 % change on previous year East Asia & Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, East Asia & Pacific or South Africa?
South Africa, at 181.13 % change on previous year against 6.32 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between East Asia & Pacific and South Africa?
174.81 % change on previous year, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and South Africa?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and South Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 13th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs South Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-annual/east-asia-and-pacific/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-annual/east-asia-and-pacific/south-africa/">East Asia & Pacific vs South Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,818 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.