Africa Eastern and Southern vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Africa Eastern and Southern
1.83 billion current US$
in 2019
Malawi
152.37 million current US$
in 2023
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
27th
Malawi rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Malawi
01.0B2.0B3.0B197019962023

How they compare

Africa Eastern and Southern currently reports 1.83 billion current US$ against 152.37 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 1.67 billion current US$.

That makes Africa Eastern and Southern's figure about 12.0 times Malawi's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Africa Eastern and Southern has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 27th and Malawi ranks 29th of 45 groups.

Africa Eastern and Southern has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 116.19 million current US$ 3.31 million current US$ 112.88 million current US$ Africa Eastern and Southern
1980s 455.49 million current US$ 20.26 million current US$ 435.22 million current US$ Africa Eastern and Southern
1990s 961.69 million current US$ 53.74 million current US$ 907.95 million current US$ Africa Eastern and Southern
2000s 1.81 billion current US$ 76.04 million current US$ 1.73 billion current US$ Africa Eastern and Southern
2010s 2.26 billion current US$ 106.72 million current US$ 2.15 billion current US$ Africa Eastern and Southern

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Africa Eastern and Southern or Malawi?
Africa Eastern and Southern, at 1.83 billion current US$ against 152.37 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2019.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Africa Eastern and Southern and Malawi?
1.67 billion current US$, with Africa Eastern and Southern ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Malawi?
49 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2019.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 27th and Malawi ranks 29th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/africa-eastern-and-southern/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/africa-eastern-and-southern/malawi/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 9,673 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.