Aruba vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Aruba
-40,000 current US$
in 1999
New Caledonia
-380,000 current US$
in 1999
Aruba rank
164th
New Caledonia rank
166th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Aruba
  • New Caledonia
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196819831999

How they compare

Aruba currently reports -40,000 current US$ against -380,000 current US$ in New Caledonia, a difference of 340,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1988 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Aruba ranks 164th and New Caledonia ranks 166th of 172 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1980s 30,000 current US$ 460,000 current US$ 430,000 current US$ New Caledonia
1990s 1.43 million current US$ 3.19 million current US$ 1.76 million current US$ New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Aruba or New Caledonia?
Aruba, at -40,000 current US$ against -380,000 current US$ in New Caledonia as of 1999.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Aruba and New Caledonia?
340,000 current US$, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and New Caledonia?
12 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 1999.
How do Aruba and New Caledonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Aruba ranks 164th and New Caledonia ranks 166th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/aruba/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/aruba/new-caledonia/">Aruba vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 9,673 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.