Brazil vs China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Brazil
122.54 million current US$
in 2023
China
120.09 million current US$
in 2023
Brazil rank
41st
China rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Brazil
  • China
-100.0M0100.0M200.0M300.0M197219972023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 122.54 million current US$ against 120.09 million current US$ in China, a difference of 2.45 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was China ahead.

Brazil ranks 41st and China ranks 44th of 172 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and China in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil China Difference Ahead
1980s 1.51 million current US$ 13.48 million current US$ 11.97 million current US$ China
1990s 19.06 million current US$ 28.74 million current US$ 9.68 million current US$ China
2000s 24.95 million current US$ 45.45 million current US$ 20.50 million current US$ China
2010s 72.74 million current US$ 107.40 million current US$ 34.65 million current US$ China
2020s 128.47 million current US$ 112.55 million current US$ 15.92 million current US$ Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Brazil or China?
Brazil, at 122.54 million current US$ against 120.09 million current US$ in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Brazil and China?
2.45 million current US$, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Brazil and China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Brazil ranks 41st and China ranks 44th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/china/">Brazil vs China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 9,673 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.