China vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time
- China
- Estonia
How they compare
China currently reports 120.09 million current US$ against 108.30 million current US$ in Estonia, a difference of 11.79 million current US$.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was China ahead.
China ranks 44th and Estonia ranks 46th of 172 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.14 million current US$ | 24.27 million current US$ | 1.87 million current US$ | China |
| 2000s | 37.41 million current US$ | 56.77 million current US$ | 19.36 million current US$ | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, China or Estonia?
- China, at 120.09 million current US$ against 108.30 million current US$ in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between China and Estonia?
- 11.79 million current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Estonia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do China and Estonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- China ranks 44th and Estonia ranks 46th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.