China vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC … gaps European Union institutions

China
120.09 million current US$
in 2023
Tanzania
120.60 million current US$
in 2023
China rank
44th
Tanzania rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC … gaps European Union institutions over time

  • China
  • Tanzania
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M197219972023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 120.60 million current US$ against 120.09 million current US$ in China, a difference of 509,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Tanzania ahead.

China ranks 44th and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 172 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Tanzania Difference Ahead
1980s 13.48 million current US$ 35.13 million current US$ 21.65 million current US$ Tanzania
1990s 28.74 million current US$ 63.70 million current US$ 34.96 million current US$ Tanzania
2000s 45.45 million current US$ 140.11 million current US$ 94.66 million current US$ Tanzania
2010s 107.40 million current US$ 126.02 million current US$ 18.62 million current US$ Tanzania
2020s 112.55 million current US$ 114.99 million current US$ 2.43 million current US$ Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, China or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 120.60 million current US$ against 120.09 million current US$ in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between China and Tanzania?
509,000 current US$, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Tanzania?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do China and Tanzania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
China ranks 44th and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/china/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/china/tanzania/">China vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 9,673 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.