Congo vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Congo
35.78 million current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
35.67 million current US$
in 2023
Congo rank
87th
Zimbabwe rank
88th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M196019912023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 35.78 million current US$ against 35.67 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 103,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 172 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 12.99 million current US$ 2.98 million current US$ 10.01 million current US$ Congo
1980s 5.15 million current US$ 10.99 million current US$ 5.84 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 6.41 million current US$ 35.78 million current US$ 29.37 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 21.60 million current US$ 35.21 million current US$ 13.61 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 22.80 million current US$ 74.95 million current US$ 52.15 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 18.08 million current US$ 66.34 million current US$ 48.26 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Congo or Zimbabwe?
Congo, at 35.78 million current US$ against 35.67 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Congo and Zimbabwe?
103,000 current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
46 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Congo ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 9,673 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.