Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
23.30 billion current US$
in 2023
Poland
1.10 billion current US$
in 2004
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
5th
Poland rank
2nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Poland
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B25.0B196019912023

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) currently reports 23.30 billion current US$ against 1.10 billion current US$ in Poland, a difference of 22.20 billion current US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s figure about 21.2 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Poland ranks 2nd of 45 groups.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 486.04 million current US$ 263.20 million current US$ 222.84 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
2000s 1.12 billion current US$ 725.04 million current US$ 397.93 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Poland?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), at 23.30 billion current US$ against 1.10 billion current US$ in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Poland?
22.20 billion current US$, with Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Poland?
15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Poland rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Poland ranks 2nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/poland/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 9,673 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.