Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
3.27 billion current US$
in 2022
Lithuania
217.86 million current US$
in 2004
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
17th
Lithuania rank
18th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Lithuania
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B197019962022

How they compare

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) currently reports 3.27 billion current US$ against 217.86 million current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 3.05 billion current US$.

That makes Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s figure about 15.0 times Lithuania's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 17th and Lithuania ranks 18th of 45 groups.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 1.46 billion current US$ 37.28 million current US$ 1.43 billion current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2000s 1.79 billion current US$ 152.31 million current US$ 1.64 billion current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Lithuania?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), at 3.27 billion current US$ against 217.86 million current US$ in Lithuania as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
3.05 billion current US$, with Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 17th and Lithuania ranks 18th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 9,673 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.