Iraq vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time
- Iraq
- Latvia
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 142.39 million current US$ against 133.54 million current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 8.85 million current US$.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Iraq ranks 33rd and Latvia ranks 36th of 172 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.27 million current US$ | 26.93 million current US$ | 11.67 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 45.83 million current US$ | 72.12 million current US$ | 26.30 million current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Iraq or Latvia?
- Iraq, at 142.39 million current US$ against 133.54 million current US$ in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Iraq and Latvia?
- 8.85 million current US$, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Latvia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Iraq and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Iraq ranks 33rd and Latvia ranks 36th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.