Latvia vs South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time
- Latvia
- South Asia
How they compare
South Asia currently reports 378.65 million current US$ against 133.54 million current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 245.11 million current US$.
That makes South Asia's figure about 2.8 times Latvia's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Asia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 36th and South Asia ranks 37th of 172 countries.
South Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | South Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.93 million current US$ | 165.69 million current US$ | 138.76 million current US$ | South Asia |
| 2000s | 72.12 million current US$ | 173.23 million current US$ | 101.10 million current US$ | South Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Latvia or South Asia?
- South Asia, at 378.65 million current US$ against 133.54 million current US$ in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Latvia and South Asia?
- 245.11 million current US$, with South Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and South Asia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Latvia and South Asia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Latvia ranks 36th and South Asia ranks 37th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.