Poland vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time
- Poland
- Serbia
How they compare
Poland currently reports 1.10 billion current US$ against 454.78 million current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 646.25 million current US$.
That makes Poland's figure about 2.4 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 5th of 172 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 368.47 million current US$ | 56.61 million current US$ | 311.87 million current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 725.04 million current US$ | 454.31 million current US$ | 270.73 million current US$ | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Poland or Serbia?
- Poland, at 1.10 billion current US$ against 454.78 million current US$ in Serbia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Poland and Serbia?
- 646.25 million current US$, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2004.
- How do Poland and Serbia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Poland ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 5th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.