East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.2871 current US$ per person
in 2023
Hungary
23.53 current US$ per person
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
39th
Hungary rank
36th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Hungary
-40-2002040196019912023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 23.53 current US$ per person against 0.2871 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 23.24 current US$ per person.

That makes Hungary's figure about 82.0 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hungary ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 39th and Hungary ranks 36th of 45 groups.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1266 current US$ per person 9.58 current US$ per person 9.45 current US$ per person Hungary
2000s 0.1511 current US$ per person 21.64 current US$ per person 21.49 current US$ per person Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Hungary?
Hungary, at 23.53 current US$ per person against 0.2871 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hungary?
23.24 current US$ per person, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hungary?
15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hungary rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 39th and Hungary ranks 36th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/hungary/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 9,506 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.