Jamaica vs Macau, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions
Jamaica
1.05 current US$ per person
in 2023
Macau, China
0.8525 current US$ per person
in 1998
Jamaica rank
130th
Macau, China rank
132nd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time
- Jamaica
- Macau, China
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 1.05 current US$ per person against 0.8525 current US$ per person in Macau, China, a difference of 0.1975 current US$ per person.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.2 times Macau, China's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 130th and Macau, China ranks 132nd of 172 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Jamaica or Macau, China?
- Jamaica, at 1.05 current US$ per person against 0.8525 current US$ per person in Macau, China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Jamaica and Macau, China?
- 0.1975 current US$ per person, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Macau, China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 1998.
- How do Jamaica and Macau, China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Jamaica ranks 130th and Macau, China ranks 132nd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.