Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Slovenia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
1.2 current US$ per person
in 2023
Slovenia
24.46 current US$ per person
in 2002
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank
30th
Slovenia rank
33rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
  • Slovenia
0204060196019912023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 24.46 current US$ per person against 1.2 current US$ per person in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), a difference of 23.26 current US$ per person.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 20.4 times Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Slovenia ranks 33rd of 45 groups.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.13 current US$ per person 18.63 current US$ per person 17.5 current US$ per person Slovenia
2000s 0.797 current US$ per person 38.78 current US$ per person 37.99 current US$ per person Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 24.46 current US$ per person against 1.2 current US$ per person in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) as of 2002.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Slovenia?
23.26 current US$ per person, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Slovenia?
10 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2002.
How do Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Slovenia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Slovenia ranks 33rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Slovenia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-capita/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-capita/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/slovenia/">Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Slovenia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 9,506 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.