Africa Eastern and Southern vs Czechia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Africa Eastern and Southern
123 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2019
Czechia
3,032 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
31st
Czechia rank
31st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Czechia
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019942019

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 3,032 current US$ per square kilometre against 123 current US$ per square kilometre in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 2,909 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Czechia's figure about 24.7 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 31st and Czechia ranks 31st of 45 groups.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Czechia Difference Ahead
1990s 75.7 current US$ per square kilometre 1,839 current US$ per square kilometre 1,764 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 99.25 current US$ per square kilometre 3,238 current US$ per square kilometre 3,138 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Africa Eastern and Southern or Czechia?
Czechia, at 3,032 current US$ per square kilometre against 123 current US$ per square kilometre in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Africa Eastern and Southern and Czechia?
2,909 current US$ per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Czechia?
12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Czechia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 31st and Czechia ranks 31st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Czechia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/africa-eastern-and-southern/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/africa-eastern-and-southern/czechia/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Czechia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.