Africa Western and Central vs Georgia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Africa Western and Central
190.59 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2019
Georgia
4,231 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Africa Western and Central rank
24th
Georgia rank
24th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Africa Western and Central
  • Georgia
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019962023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 4,231 current US$ per square kilometre against 190.59 current US$ per square kilometre in Africa Western and Central, a difference of 4,040 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 22.2 times Africa Western and Central's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Africa Western and Central ahead.

Africa Western and Central ranks 24th and Georgia ranks 24th of 45 groups.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Western and Central Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 76.39 current US$ per square kilometre 415.17 current US$ per square kilometre 338.77 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 112.54 current US$ per square kilometre 737.79 current US$ per square kilometre 625.25 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 196.89 current US$ per square kilometre 2,770 current US$ per square kilometre 2,573 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Africa Western and Central or Georgia?
Georgia, at 4,231 current US$ per square kilometre against 190.59 current US$ per square kilometre in Africa Western and Central as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Africa Western and Central and Georgia?
4,040 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Western and Central and Georgia?
28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
How do Africa Western and Central and Georgia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Africa Western and Central ranks 24th and Georgia ranks 24th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Western and Central vs Georgia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/africa-western-and-central/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/africa-western-and-central/georgia/">Africa Western and Central vs Georgia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.