Belize vs Ghana: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Belize
206.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana
187.93 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
98th
Ghana rank
101st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Belize
  • Ghana
0200400600800197019962023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 206.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 187.93 current US$ per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 18.75 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Ghana ahead.

Belize ranks 98th and Ghana ranks 101st of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 2 and Ghana in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Ghana Difference Ahead
1970s 10.96 current US$ per square kilometre 48.83 current US$ per square kilometre 37.87 current US$ per square kilometre Ghana
1980s 35.07 current US$ per square kilometre 99.86 current US$ per square kilometre 64.79 current US$ per square kilometre Ghana
1990s 200.96 current US$ per square kilometre 185.8 current US$ per square kilometre 15.16 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2000s 221.96 current US$ per square kilometre 317.14 current US$ per square kilometre 95.18 current US$ per square kilometre Ghana
2010s 526.4 current US$ per square kilometre 314.71 current US$ per square kilometre 211.69 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2020s 255.33 current US$ per square kilometre 270.74 current US$ per square kilometre 15.41 current US$ per square kilometre Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Belize or Ghana?
Belize, at 206.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 187.93 current US$ per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Belize and Ghana?
18.75 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Ghana?
45 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
How do Belize and Ghana rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Belize ranks 98th and Ghana ranks 101st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Ghana: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/belize/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/belize/ghana/">Belize vs Ghana: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.