Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Bhutan
87.41 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
92.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
123rd
Zimbabwe rank
122nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Bhutan
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600197820002023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 92.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 87.41 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 4.8 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Bhutan ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 122nd of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.214 current US$ per square kilometre 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 10.7 current US$ per square kilometre 32.73 current US$ per square kilometre 22.03 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 75.06 current US$ per square kilometre 92.5 current US$ per square kilometre 17.43 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 82.61 current US$ per square kilometre 91.01 current US$ per square kilometre 8.4 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 166.8 current US$ per square kilometre 193.74 current US$ per square kilometre 26.94 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 244.8 current US$ per square kilometre 171.49 current US$ per square kilometre 73.31 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Bhutan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 92.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 87.41 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Bhutan and Zimbabwe?
4.8 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Zimbabwe?
41 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Bhutan ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 122nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/bhutan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/bhutan/zimbabwe/">Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.