Chad vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Chad
106.92 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
92.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
120th
Zimbabwe rank
122nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Chad
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 106.92 current US$ per square kilometre against 92.21 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 14.71 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 122nd of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 14 current US$ per square kilometre 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre 12.17 current US$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 17.9 current US$ per square kilometre 28.41 current US$ per square kilometre 10.5 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 19.66 current US$ per square kilometre 92.5 current US$ per square kilometre 72.84 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 53.93 current US$ per square kilometre 91.01 current US$ per square kilometre 37.09 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 105.88 current US$ per square kilometre 193.74 current US$ per square kilometre 87.86 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 99.37 current US$ per square kilometre 171.49 current US$ per square kilometre 72.12 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Chad or Zimbabwe?
Chad, at 106.92 current US$ per square kilometre against 92.21 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Chad and Zimbabwe?
14.71 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zimbabwe?
45 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
How do Chad and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Chad ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 122nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/chad/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/chad/zimbabwe/">Chad vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.