Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Ecuador
414.59 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
457.77 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
76th
Sri Lanka rank
73rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sri Lanka
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 457.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 414.59 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 43.18 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Ecuador ranks 76th and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 170 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4046 current US$ per square kilometre 107.61 current US$ per square kilometre 107.2 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 7.14 current US$ per square kilometre 192.9 current US$ per square kilometre 185.76 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 37.4 current US$ per square kilometre 115.61 current US$ per square kilometre 78.22 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 102.88 current US$ per square kilometre 531.4 current US$ per square kilometre 428.52 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 272.88 current US$ per square kilometre 731.02 current US$ per square kilometre 458.14 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 218.59 current US$ per square kilometre 545.75 current US$ per square kilometre 327.16 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Ecuador or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 457.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 414.59 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
43.18 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Ecuador ranks 76th and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/ecuador/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/ecuador/sri-lanka/">Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.