El Salvador vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

El Salvador
770.85 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
761.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
El Salvador rank
61st
Hong Kong, China rank
62nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • El Salvador
  • Hong Kong, China
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197720002023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 770.85 current US$ per square kilometre against 761.9 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 8.95 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

El Salvador ranks 61st and Hong Kong, China ranks 62nd of 170 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1980s 178.09 current US$ per square kilometre 2,444 current US$ per square kilometre 2,266 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 1,113 current US$ per square kilometre 2,232 current US$ per square kilometre 1,119 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, El Salvador or Hong Kong, China?
El Salvador, at 770.85 current US$ per square kilometre against 761.9 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between El Salvador and Hong Kong, China?
8.95 current US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Hong Kong, China?
8 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 1996.
How do El Salvador and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
El Salvador ranks 61st and Hong Kong, China ranks 62nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/el-salvador/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/el-salvador/hong-kong-sar-china/">El Salvador vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.