Eswatini vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Eswatini
782.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada
824.95 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
60th
Grenada rank
58th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Eswatini
  • Grenada
-10.0k010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197119972023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 824.95 current US$ per square kilometre against 782.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 42.88 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 60th and Grenada ranks 58th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Grenada Difference Ahead
1970s 383.33 current US$ per square kilometre 500 current US$ per square kilometre 116.67 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1980s 262.38 current US$ per square kilometre 6,550 current US$ per square kilometre 6,288 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1990s 440.76 current US$ per square kilometre 8,826 current US$ per square kilometre 8,386 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2000s 583.02 current US$ per square kilometre 13,594 current US$ per square kilometre 13,011 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2010s 1,375 current US$ per square kilometre 7,553 current US$ per square kilometre 6,178 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2020s 1,142 current US$ per square kilometre 1,002 current US$ per square kilometre 140.44 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Eswatini or Grenada?
Grenada, at 824.95 current US$ per square kilometre against 782.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Eswatini and Grenada?
42.88 current US$ per square kilometre, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Grenada?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Grenada rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Eswatini ranks 60th and Grenada ranks 58th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/eswatini/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/eswatini/grenada/">Eswatini vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.