Eswatini vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Eswatini
782.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
761.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Eswatini rank
60th
Hong Kong, China rank
62nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Eswatini
  • Hong Kong, China
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197119972023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 782.07 current US$ per square kilometre against 761.9 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 20.17 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 60th and Hong Kong, China ranks 62nd of 170 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1980s 465.7 current US$ per square kilometre 2,444 current US$ per square kilometre 1,979 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 455.81 current US$ per square kilometre 2,232 current US$ per square kilometre 1,776 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Eswatini or Hong Kong, China?
Eswatini, at 782.07 current US$ per square kilometre against 761.9 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Eswatini and Hong Kong, China?
20.17 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Hong Kong, China?
8 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 1996.
How do Eswatini and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Eswatini ranks 60th and Hong Kong, China ranks 62nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/eswatini/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/eswatini/hong-kong-sar-china/">Eswatini vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.